[Suggestion] Stop requiring 2 ore for 1 ingot

10 votes

very little recipes require raw ore so the 2 ore to 1 ingot seems just a pain. If the goal is balance, then reducing the ore gained, increasing the time to mine ore, or increasing the smelting time could all keep the balance without requiring the movement of large volumes of ore. early game it seems OK, but later game when you need lots of it for many recipes, it's just a pain to run back and forth to collect. Especially if the goal is to venture further and further away to obtain it.

Under consideration Balance Suggested by: tonythegardener (12 Sep, '21) • Upvoted: 14 Jan, '22 • Comments: 2

Comments: 2

14 Sep, '21
Engimage
Yeah with the amount of Iron needed for everything this looks just as an extra inconvenience for me. Also those single ores left in the inventory...
24 Dec, '21
shin0bi272
I would agree for things like gold or titanium which needs 5 ore per ingot but iron and copper are everywhere so its really not that big of a deal. Plus its more realistic due to impurities in ore you have slag so you lose some in the process but 5 per titanium ingot? just no.